Posts Tagged ‘tamb’

HUD continues guidance on new RESPA forms; Delivers more FAQs four weeks after rule effective date

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Issue Date: RESPA News Monthly
January 2010, Posted On: 2/2/2010
In-Depth Reports

Late last year, many industry professionals predicted that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) would continue releasing more rounds of RESPA final rule frequently asked questions (FAQs) well into the New Year. This prediction was validated on Jan. 28 when HUD issued yet another revision to its already massive document. The guidance is intended to help industry members with questions as they implement the new Good Faith Estimate (GFE) and HUD-1 Settlement Statement forms. The forms went into effect on Jan. 1.

 

In this new round of FAQs, HUD added some new questions and made some revisions to existing FAQs. On Page 4, HUD added language to its answer for the following question: May a loan originator require the use of its affiliate for the tax service or flood certificate? HUD originally stated, “No, a loan originator may not require the use of its affiliate for tax service or flood certificate.” It has added the following: “But a loan originator may require the use of a non-affiliated provider.”

HUD added several new FAQs that addressed questions about the formatting of the new forms. It clarified the following:

  • Changing the pagination of the GFE is not permitted;
  • The GFE may be on legal size paper;
  • Shading and margins may be changed on the HUD-1; and
  • Lines may be added to the HUD-1 and a blank line within a series may be deleted from the form.

HUD also provided an answer to the question on whether an FHA loan correspondent is considered a broker or lender if he closes a loan in his name and is not table-funded by his sponsor, but rather is funded from his own funds or from a warehouse line of credit which he controls. According to HUD, in this scenario, the correspondent is considered to be a lender.

HUD also noted that if a mortgage broker provides the initial GFE and the lender accepts the loan, the lender cannot issue a new initial GFE, but rather is bound by the terms disclosed to the borrower by the broker.

In addition, there is a new FAQ that says loan originators cannot require borrowers to sign consent forms as a condition of issuing a GFE.

“A loan originator may not require a borrower to sign consents to verify employment, income or deposits as a condition of issuing a GFE as such a requirement may inhibit borrowers from shopping for the best loan by leading borrowers to believe that they are committed to obtaining a loan from that loan originator (see 24 CFR § 3500.7(a) (5) and (b) (5)),” HUD said. “However, the borrower may voluntarily sign consents prior to the issuance of the GFE to facilitate the loan process.”

On Page 8 of the FAQs, HUD clarified that if a borrower locks the interest rate after a GFE has been issued, a revised GFE must be issued within three days of the interest rate lock. This revised GFE would reflect the date that the interest rate lock is good through by putting this information in line 1 and putting “N/A” in line 4 of the “Important dates” section on Page 1 of the form.

“Any interest rate-dependent charges (block 2, line A and block 10 on the GFE) and terms that changed must also be updated on the revised GFE,” HUD said.

HUD also included more guidance on disclosing appraisal management fees. However, according to some chatter among lender compliance professionals on a real estate blog, this guidance may not be all that helpful.

“We have conflicting new FAQs,” one blogger wrote. “If an appraisal management company retains independent appraisers to perform the appraisal, the portion of the fee retained by the appraisal management company for management of the process of obtaining the appraisal may have to be folded into block 1 of the GFE and line 801 of the HUD-1. And, only the portion of the fee retained by the appraiser may be disclosed in block 3 and on line 804 of the HUD-1.”

On Page 26, the FAQ states:

“Q: What charges are part of the charge in block 1 of the GFE, ‘Our origination charge?’

A: Block 1, “Our origination charge” on the GFE contains all charges for origination services performed by or on behalf of a lender and/or a mortgage broker. Origination services includes, but is not limited to, the following: taking of the loan application, loan processing, underwriting of the loan, funding of the loan, acting as an intermediary between a borrower and lender, obtaining verifications and appraisals, and any processing and administrative services required to perform these functions.”

The phrases “services performed by or on behalf of a lender” and “obtaining verifications and appraisals,” are what seem to be troubling and one blogger wrote that HUD contradicts itself in a separate FAQ on Page 46. The FAQ reads:

“Q: If an appraisal is ordered through XYZ appraisal vendor management company and the appraisal is subcontracted to ABC Appraisal Company, what name is identified in line 804 on the HUD-1?

A: XYZ appraisal management company must be identified on Line 804.”

“So which is it? Is the portion of the fee for referring out the appraisal an administrative fee (and is this a violation of Section 8(a) and 8(b) of RESPA for taking a referral fee and taking a split of the appraisal fee without providing appraisal services), or is putting the appraisal management company on the HUD as the appraiser kosher? Note that if the title agent farms out the closing or a portion of the closing, the fee paid to the closer is disclosed on line 1102. Why should the appraisal be handled differently,” the blogger questioned.

Moreover, on Page 11, HUD addresses the question of whether or not a loan originator has to show an appraisal fee (or other fee) paid to a third party on the GFE and HUD-1, even if the loan originator wants to cover 100 percent of the fee. HUD says yes.

“The loan originator must list all required third-party services on the GFE and HUD-1 regardless of whether the charge is paid by the borrower, seller, loan originator or any other party (except for administrative and processing services),” HUD said. “If any party other than the borrower is paying for a service that was on the GFE, such as the appraisal fee, the charge remains in the borrower’s column on the HUD-1. A credit from the paying party to the borrower to offset the charge should be listed on the first page of the HUD-1 in lines 204-209 and, if the service was paid by the seller, lines 506-509 respectively.”

Regarding the written list of service providers that the loan originator must give to the borrower, on Page 15, HUD clarifies that a loan originator may include a statement on this document that the listing of a service provider on the “written list” does not constitute an endorsement of that service provider.

On Page 28, question seven asks if the yield spread premium can be shown as “paid outside of closing” on the GFE and the HUD-1? HUD says no.

“The yield spread premium is applied as a credit to the borrower in block 2 on the GFE and in line 802 on the HUD-1,” HUD noted.

HUD also provides more guidance on “changed circumstances,” the “Important dates” section, where to disclose an escrow waiver fee, condominium certificates, the disclosure of third-party services, transfer taxes, curing tolerances and seller-paid items.

HUD issued its first round of FAQs in August. At that time, the guidance spanned 16 pages and provided insight on a little less than 100 questions. Now, the document is 57 pages and includes a table of context that categorizes about 275 Q&As. For a copy of the latest FAQ report, go here.

New Life for the First-Time Credit?

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

By Kenneth R. Harney
Saturday, September 26, 2009

Will Congress extend the wildly popular $8,000 home-buyer tax credit beyond its Nov. 30 expiration date?

That’s a question generating huge pressure on Capitol Hill from would-be buyers who haven’t found the right house, realty agents, builders, lenders and squads of lobbyists working on their behalf.

Here’s the first hint of an answer: On Sept. 17, the leadership of Congress’s primary tax-writing committee introduced a tax credit bill that’s likely to zip through the House and quickly move to the Senate. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) sponsored the bipartisan Service Members Homeownership Tax Act (H.R. 3590), which would extend the credit 12 months for thousands of military, Foreign Service and intelligence agency personnel who have been posted abroad in 2009.

Rangel’s bill, with 29 co-sponsors, would keep the credit alive through Nov. 30, 2010, for service members who had at least 90 days of overseas duty assignments in 2009 and who otherwise meet the eligibility tests for the credit. The bill would also prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from “recapturing” the $8,000 credit when service members are forced to sell or rent out their houses because they are ordered to deploy to a different duty station.

Under the rules of the program, buyers who obtain the credit must use their houses as a principal residence for 36 months or repay the credit to the IRS. As a result of the 36-month rule, many military and diplomatic employees have been hesitant to buy a house and claim the credit, or are worried that their absence from the country could force them to repay the money.

For example, the spouse of a Foreign Service officer posted to the Philippines this summer for a two-year assignment wrote to Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) to alert him to a flaw in the tax-credit program. The Oregon couple bought their first home earlier this year, encouraged by affordable prices and the $8,000 credit. But having now been posted abroad, they cannot claim to occupy the house as their principal residence. Under current rules, they even face recapture of the full credit.

Blumenauer, who is a member of the Ways and Means Committee, said, “It is absurd that thousands of Americans serving our country, away from friends and family, must choose between their service work and homeownership.” He wrote corrective legislative language that ultimately was incorporated into Rangel’s tax bill.

Though nothing is guaranteed on Capitol Hill, legislation eliminating tax penalties on the military during wartime looks like a good bet for early passage in both houses. Equally significant: It now appears likely that there will be an $8,000 tax credit available a year from now — at least for some purchasers. That raises the question: Why not leave it in place for all first-time buyers?

There’s growing support for that on both sides of the Capitol, but there are also some complicating issues. In the Senate, the most outspoken advocate for months has been a Republican, Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia, a former real estate broker. He wants not only to extend the credit to Dec. 1, 2010, but to raise the maximum to $15,000, and make it available to all home buyers next year.

But recently, key Senate Democrats produced their own version of an extension, limited to six months, retaining the ceiling at $8,000 and targeting only first-time purchasers. The bill’s primary sponsor is Sen. Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.). Democratic co-sponsors include Majority Leader Harry M. Reid of Nevada and Debbie Stabenow of Michigan. Republicans John Ensign of Nevada and Isakson have signed on as well.

In a statement, Cardin raised what may prove to be the crucial issue affecting the scope and duration of any credit extension: cost. “A six-month extension is a fiscally responsible way to provide adequate time to nudge even more prospective homebuyers off the sidelines,” he said.

Estimates of the revenue costs of the current credit vary widely, from $3 billion to $8 billion and higher. How do you pay for any extension without worsening the budget deficit? The new Rangel bill includes an answer: You raise taxes somewhere else — you “pay as you go.” The Rangel bill pays for most of the service members’ credit extension by increasing IRS penalties on taxpayers who fail to file partnership or “S” corporation returns.

This would raise an estimated $327 million over the next 10 years. Where and how to raise taxes to cover the far larger cost of a six-month or 12-month extension of the current tax credit could prove much more controversial.

Mortgage Texas News Recap

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

Maryland Title Co. Owner Gets 7 Years in Prison

September 11, 2009

U.S. District Judge Catherine C. Blake sentenced Deborah Williams, a title company owner from Pasadena, Md., to 84 months in prison for mail fraud and diverting settlement funds for her benefit. Williams was ordered to forfeit $3.4 million. Williams was the sole officer and director of Day Title, a title company with offices in Severna Park, Md., that conducted real estate closings and issued title insurance policies. According to Rod Rosenstein, U.S. attorney for the District of Maryland, Williams concealed her illegal transactions by falsely representing on settlement documents that her company had paid off lien holders and then sent the falsified settlement documents to the lender by commercial carrier. She initiated stop payments of payoff checks that had been disbursed or intentionally failed to mail the payoff checks to the lien holder.

FNC Hires New President

September 11, 2009

FNC Inc., a real estate collateral technology provider based in Oxford, Miss., has hired Glen Evans as president. Most recently, he was a senior vice president at FTN Financial, a subsidiary of First Tennessee Bank. Mr. Evans, who has been in the business for 25 years, will report directly to FNC CEO and co-founder, Bill Rayburn. “FNC has grown beyond its start-up phase,” Mr. Rayburn said. “Glen’s background and industry knowledge will help us expand our mortgage clients and our business.” FNC’s new president previously ran FTN Financial’s correspondent services division. The company said Mr. Evans’ primary goal will be to help the firm meet its revenue goals.

Fitch Cites Negative Equity/Job Losses for Downgrades

September 11, 2009

A continuing rise in negative home equity and unemployment has led to rating actions on 581 prime residential mortgage-backed securities transactions issued between 2005 and 2008, according to Fitch Ratings, New York. “While actual loan losses to date remain low on average for the transactions reviewed (36 basis points), average delinquency has almost doubled since the start of the year to 11% and continues to grow due to high average roll-rates from performing to delinquency,” Fitch said in a report. About 45% of the borrowers in the private-label MBS reviewed by Fitch owed more on their mortgages than their homes were worth, according to Grant Bailey, a senior director at the rating company.

GAO Throws Cold Water on GSEs Becoming Utilities

September 11, 2009

The Government Accountability Office, in a new report, has entered into the debate over the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, blistering some of the most widely discussed options for revamping the two. Though the watchdog agency did not take a formal position on what policymakers should do with the GSEs, it essentially declared two ideas unworkable — fully privatizing Fannie and Freddie or turning them into public utilities. Those options could spur inefficiencies, raise mortgage rates and take banks out of the business of offering traditional mortgages, the GAO concluded. The report offered detailed pros and cons of other options including nationalizing Fannie and Freddie, simply restoring the firms to their previous status, breaking them up into multiple entities or turning them into cooperatives. In the year since the federal government seized the GSEs, options for how to deal with them have multiplied, even though the Obama administration has said it will not deal with the issue until 2010. While many Republicans and other conservatives have pushed for years to privatize the GSEs or eliminate them, the GAO found only one benefit to such an approach: enhanced market discipline. But the agency warned that it was not clear if privatized GSEs could support the mortgage market during a crisis.

Homebuyer Tax Credit Boosted Sales by 314,000

September 11, 2009

Introduced earlier this year as part of the president’s economic stimulus bill, the $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit, to date, has prompted 314,000 additional consumers to get off the fence and purchase a home, according to new figures released by the White House. The National Association of Realtors estimates that the tax credit will boost home sales by an additional 350,000 by the time it expires on December 1. Overall, 1.8 million first-time homebuyers may take advantage of the tax credit, according to NAR economists. Meanwhile, homebuilders, Realtors and other housing groups are trying to get the word out that buyers must go to closing by November 30 to take advantage of the tax credit. In mid-October, housing groups will mount a public campaign to extend and increase the tax credit and possibly expand it to all homebuyers. But for now, the lobbying is low key so potential first-timers won’t get the idea they can sit back and wait for an extension. In July, 30% of existing home sales were by first-time buyers.

Lone Star Unit Buys Assets from AZ Mortgage Banker

September 11, 2009

Caliber Funding, which is controlled by private equity firm Lone Star Funds, has agreed to acquire what it calls “certain technology and operational assets” from StoneWater Mortgage for an undisclosed sum, according to a source close to the deal. Both non-depository lenders are based in Arizona. Caliber expects to retain most of StoneWater’s employees. No further information was available on the deal, including figures on the firms’ origination and servicing volumes. A spokesman for Caliber confirmed the transaction. The Dallas-based Lone Star has been bottom fishing in the mortgage market the past year. A year ago the private equity firm made headlines when it paid 22 cents on the dollar ($6.7 billion) for $30.6 billion in mortgage CDOs held by then struggling Merrill Lynch & Co. (This was prior to Merrill’s sale to Bank of America.) The PE firm also bought CIT’s home lending business.

Wilbur Ross Bidding on MI United Guaranty?

September 11, 2009

Investor Wilbur Ross, one of the most active bidders on distressed mortgage assets, is gearing up to make a run at mortgage insurance giant United Guaranty Inc., a unit of American International Group, according to MI and investment banking sources. One investment banker described Mr. Ross — a principal in WL Ross & Co., New York — as the leading bidder on UGI, the nation’s fifth largest MI in terms of policies-in-force. (Figures courtesy of the Quarterly Data Report.) However, it’s unclear if Mr. Ross is bidding on all or part of the company and whether he has partners on the deal. Spokespersons for both AIG and UGI had no comment. Mr. Ross had not returned a telephone call as National Mortgage News went to press. Over the past 18 months he has acquired two large non-prime residential servicing portfolios. Ross was part of an investor group that bought failed Florida bank BankUnited FSB, a large player in the payment option ARM market. He also recently hired James Lockhart, former director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, who is familiar with the MI industry and its role in guaranteeing loans sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. “Ross’ interest in the MI business is very important,” said one MI executive. “It shows the importance of this business. He can be an important part of the MI business moving forward.”

Real Estate Investor Convicted of Fraud

September 10, 2009

Mario Bernadel, a real estate investor from Phoenix, has been convicted of running a mortgage fraud scheme involving at least 32 residential properties in the greater Phoenix area. According to John J. Tuchi, interim U.S. attorney for the District of Arizona, participants in the scheme recruited unqualified straw borrowers, submitted fraudulent loan applications on their behalf, obtained mortgage loans in excess of the selling price and then took the excess amount of the loans out through escrow. Bernadel recruited and trained mortgage brokers, straw buyers and an escrow officer in the scheme and, following the funding of the loans, received cash back. The homes purchased through the scheme have been foreclosed or sold at a loss. Seven other co-conspirators were also charged and have pleaded guilty and await sentencing. The scheme resulted in $20 million in loans obtained by fraud and a loss of more than $2 million. Bernadel’s conviction is part of “Operation Cash Back,” in which 40 defendants were indicted and arrested. Bernadel is the 20th defendant to date who has been convicted. U.S. District Judge Stephen M. McNamee set sentencing for Nov. 30.

Reverse Lender Gets New Leader

September 10, 2009

Generation Mortgage Co., Atlanta has named Scott Peters president and chief executive, replacing Joe Morris. Mr. Morris, who served as president and CEO since the company’s inception in 2006, will take on the role of executive director, industry relations, where he will represent Generation Mortgage as an industry advocate to play a stronger role with organizations such as the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association, lend support to wholesale relationships and will also be active legislatively. Mr. Peters joins Generation Mortgage from Nortel Networks Corp., where he led the Global Business Services division. He also held senior leadership positions within General Electric Capital Corp., MassMutual, BellSouth Corp., The Profit Recovery Group International and CompuCredit Corp.

Beige Book Reads Well for Home Sales in Some Areas

September 10, 2009

The Federal Reserve, in its new Beige Book report, says home sales are increasing somewhat in the Boston, Chicago, Richmond and San Francisco districts but the housing sector in general is not out of the woods yet. The St. Louis area has seen no noticeable improvement in housing conditions and most Fed districts reported that sales were “below the levels of a year earlier.” The central bank noted that housing demand “remained stronger at the low-end of the housing market.” As for home construction, the news is bleak with only Chicago and Dallas reporting small increases in housing activity. In the commercial real estate market, construction remained at low levels overall, “although Chicago and Dallas reported a small increase in activity” the Fed said. Overall, the central bank said economic activity is stabilizing or improving in the vast majority of the country and that the worst recession since the 1930s may be over